The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RITE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMT | FTK | RITE | FBIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 35 | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 49 | 80 (highest) | — | 20 |
| Pricing power | 8 | 0 | 62 (highest) | 48 |
| Returns on capital | 27 | 8 | 0 | 36 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 46 | 55 | 17 |
| Capital allocation | 19 | 44 | 24 | 54 (highest) |
| 47% above value if growth stopped today | 539% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 9% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $199M | $745M | $6.8M | $4.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |