The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNFN · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNFN | EXTR | SCOR | TOST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 56 | 50 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 33 | 91 (highest) | 71 | 8 |
| Returns on capital | — | 11 (highest) | 0 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 92 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 2502% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $5.0M | $4.0B | $110.8M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |