The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNH · Industrials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CCK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNH | CCK | SKAS | DXPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 | 56 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 69 | 23 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 26 | — | 62 (highest) | 47 |
| Returns on capital | — | 52 | 80 (highest) | 31 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 24 | 55 | 23 |
| Capital discipline | 61 | 76 | 55 | 98 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 33% below high estimate | 54% above high estimate | 52% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 215% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $12.8B | $13.0B | $6.7M | $2.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |