The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CNK · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIFA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MDIA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AREN

Score temporarily unavailable — we couldn't reach the scoring service, and we won't show a stale or guessed number.

MeasureCNKAIFAMDIAAREN
Moat Score (0–100)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend80 (highest)5050
Pricing power
Returns on capital24 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety028 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation1444 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$72.4M$79.4MNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025

Rows show "—" where a company isn't covered or its score couldn't be fetched — we don't fill gaps with guesses.