The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KRUS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNNE | WGO | XHR | KRUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 5 | 15 | 75 (highest) | 65 |
| Pricing power | 22 | 17 | 26 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 64 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 13 | 0 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 39 | 46 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 831% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $688M | Not reported | $2.0B | $526M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |