The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNR · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EGY · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNR | PKG | EGY | NCSM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 56 | 50 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 38 | — | 64 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 88 | 71 | 91 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 42 | 62 (highest) | 44 | 60 |
| 24% above value if growth stopped today | 233292% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 460% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.6B | $21.09T | $661M | $136M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |