The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNVS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ATNI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNVS | AREN | RDI | ATNI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 28 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 33 | 35 | 55 (highest) | 43 |
| Pricing power | — | 37 | 39 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 31 | 0 | 16 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 51 | 54 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $55M | $39M | $32.8M | $358M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |