The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNVS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CHTR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNVS | GAME | CHTR | AD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 57 (highest) | 44 | 40 |
| Pricing power | — | 38 | — | 75 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 0 | 11 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 40 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 37 | 17 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 335% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $58.8M | $41.4M | — | $2.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |