The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CNXC · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

KLIC · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KLTR · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VEEA · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCNXCKLICKLTRVEEA
Moat Score (0–100)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)40
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend55 (highest)205320
Pricing power627498 (highest)70
Returns on capital3441 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation24402444 (highest)
77% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)729% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$1.4B$5.3B$207M$8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025