The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DVA · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | COO | DVA | CVRX | LUNG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 63 | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 96 | 95 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 60 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 36 | 12 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 46 | 58 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| 216% above value if growth stopped today | 65% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $13.8B | $16.1B | $125M | $48.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |