The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RAVE · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | COR | LKQ | RAVE | LNN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 71 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 79 | 37 | 93 (highest) | 74 |
| Pricing power | 22 | 67 | 92 (highest) | 44 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 74 | — | 61 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 88 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 70 | 80 (highest) | 24 | 77 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 179% above high estimate | 53% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 53% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $60.1B | $6.6B | $44.5M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |