The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

COSM · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RYZ · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NMHI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AAL · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCOSMRYZNMHIAAL
Moat Score (0–100)2122 (highest)2121
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend48151380 (highest)
Pricing power030 (highest)0
Returns on capital638 (highest)3
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)028 (highest)0
Capital allocation242444 (highest)0
No price data2% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data577% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$8.2M$1.6B$112853$9.6B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025