The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

COTY · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RITE · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMT · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FBIN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureCOTYRITECMTFBIN
Moat Score (0–100)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend52 (highest)4920
Pricing power99 (highest)62848
Returns on capital002736 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety05573 (highest)17
Capital allocation24241954 (highest)
22% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data54% above value if growth stopped today17% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$2.3B$13M$209M$6.2B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025