The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CPIX | CFOR | XTNT | SHC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 80 (highest) | 75 | 51 |
| Pricing power | 98 (highest) | 49 | 96 | 92 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 0 | 12 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 55 | — |
| Capital allocation | 48 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $98.9M | $183M | $60M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |