The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CPNG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CPNG | ESCA | TSLA | LEEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 25 | 60 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 16 | 34 | 22 | 70 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 22 (highest) | 21 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 64 | 96 (highest) | 82 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 52 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| 1447% above value if growth stopped today | 34% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1589% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $26.5B | $253M | $1.33T | $101833 |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |