The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SD · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CPRI | CMPR | SD | LPX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 53 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 69 (highest) | 31 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 99 (highest) | 80 | — | 18 |
| Returns on capital | 36 | 28 | 34 | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 77 | 49 | 100 (highest) | 79 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 40 | 49 | 57 (highest) |
| 18% below value if growth stopped today | 221% above value if growth stopped today | 35% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 12% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.8B | $2.4B | $509M | $5.2B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |