The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TDAY · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LEU · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CPSH | SND | TDAY | LEU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 75 (highest) | 35 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 0 | 65 (highest) | 17 |
| Returns on capital | 11 (highest) | 7 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 55 | — | 31 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 44 |
| 425% above value if growth stopped today | 25% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 38% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $79.9M | $181M | $1.2B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |