The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BCC · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CRCT | BCC | POWL | SCIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 61 | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 20 | 100 (highest) | 61 |
| Pricing power | 47 (highest) | — | 6 | 27 |
| Returns on capital | 95 (highest) | 64 | 12 | 93 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 71 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 76 | 91 (highest) | 88 | 24 |
| 35% above value if growth stopped today | 48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 356% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $943M | $2.8B | $2.8B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |