The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CRK · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CRK | TOMZ | TSEOQ | VHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 33 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 54 (highest) | 20 | 15 | 25 |
| Pricing power | — | 93 (highest) | 0 | 12 |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 4 | 88 (highest) | 69 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 27 | 28 (highest) | 0 | 15 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 64 (highest) | 44 |
| 75% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 55% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $4.1B | $29.8M | Not reported | $435M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |