The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GENK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CRWS | BWMG | GENK | GRNQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 22 | 65 (highest) | 57 | 13 |
| Pricing power | 44 | 35 | — | 84 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 37 (highest) | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 6 | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| 58% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | 83% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $26.1M | $2M | $8.7M | $64.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |