The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CSV · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
MAR · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CSV | DORM | MAR | FSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 95 | 95 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 51 | 58 (highest) | — | 43 |
| Returns on capital | 90 (highest) | 60 | 78 | 56 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 | 61 | 15 | 84 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 88 | 100 (highest) | 76 |
| 26% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 127% above value if growth stopped today | 275% above value if growth stopped today | 230% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $555M | $3.7B | $98.9B | $6.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |