The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CTKB | COHR | LEXX | CDIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 55 | 60 (highest) | 43 |
| Pricing power | 90 (highest) | 59 | 70 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 15 | 0 | 83 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | — | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 55 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | 840% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $573M | $44.0B | $10.9M | $9.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |