The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CVGI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KMX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CVS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ABSI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCVGIKMXCVSABSI
Moat Score (0–100)21 (highest)21 (highest)21 (highest)20
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend152052 (highest)30
Pricing power191837 (highest)
Returns on capital45 (highest)140
Balance-sheet safety06028 (highest)
Capital allocation2440 (highest)024
No price data53% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)92% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$158M$8.3B$136.9BNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025