The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CVLG · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CVLG | LCUT | FCUV | OESX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 19 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 (highest) | 5 | 20 | 25 |
| Pricing power | — | 63 (highest) | 0 | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 7 | 0 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| 105% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 112% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $197M | $2.1M | $41.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |