The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CVS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DBGI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KMX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CVGI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureCVSDBGIKMXCVGI
Moat Score (0–100)21 (highest)21 (highest)21 (highest)21 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend52 (highest)342015
Pricing power37 (highest)201819
Returns on capital14045 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety028 (highest)60
Capital allocation02440 (highest)24
58% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data51% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$112.9B$39.3M$8.1B$100M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2026FY2025