The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ASII · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CWGL | ASII | POST | ZVIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 70 | 95 (highest) | 53 |
| Pricing power | 66 | 26 | 48 | 77 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 1 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 1 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 61 | 44 | 65 (highest) | 24 |
| 147% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $85.6M | $67880 | Not reported | $99M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |