The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CXAI · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SPTY · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CXAI | KE | TACT | SPTY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 38 | 49 (highest) | 31 |
| Pricing power | 98 (highest) | 24 | 73 | 67 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 25 (highest) | 14 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 66 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 35 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 91% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $195M | $594M | $52.4M | $6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |