The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CZR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ONMD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BNBX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VOYG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCZRONMDBNBXVOYG
Moat Score (0–100)37 (highest)37 (highest)37 (highest)37 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend49482060 (highest)
Pricing power064 (highest)25
Returns on capital13 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety955 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital allocation75 (highest)444434
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$6.1B$32M$271004$1.0B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025