The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LVS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HURN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | DAKT | LVS | HURN | MOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 59 | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 59 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 86 | 80 | 90 | 92 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 34 | — | 47 (highest) | 15 |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 77 (highest) | 11 | 49 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 21 | 68 | 65 |
| Capital allocation | 56 | 63 | 82 (highest) | 71 |
| 1067% above value if growth stopped today | 61% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 196% above value if growth stopped today | 367% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $882M | $25.9B | $3.0B | $8.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |