The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DARE · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NVST · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CYH · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

OFIX · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureDARENVSTCYHOFIX
Moat Score (0–100)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend133965 (highest)65 (highest)
Pricing power7794100 (highest)96
Returns on capital07 (highest)4
Balance-sheet safety5590 (highest)4028
Capital allocation44 (highest)142444 (highest)
No price data230% above value if growth stopped today79% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$18.6M$4.3B$378M$448M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025