The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DD · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PED · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EMN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DD | CITR | PED | EMN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 31 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 50 | 55 (highest) | 26 |
| Pricing power | 32 | 52 (highest) | — | 39 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 46 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 26 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | — |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 29 | 44 (highest) | 14 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 58% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 49% above high estimate |
| Market cap | Not reported | $94.3M | $57.3M | $15.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |