The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CXAI · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SPTY · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DDD | CXAI | SPTY | THRY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | — | 31 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 62 | 98 (highest) | 67 | 98 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 29 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 20 |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 20 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 104% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $375M | $6.2M | $3.5M | $167M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |