The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UPYY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DDOG | AWRE | UPYY | SVCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 (highest) | 36 | 20 | 56 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 86 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | — | 12 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 52 | 64 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $23.4M | $15.8M | $240M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |