The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WHG · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MVNC · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DFDV | WHG | MVNC | IREN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 | 45 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 50 | 60 | 63 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 45 | 84 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 11 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 100 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 42 | 18 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $175M | Not reported | $290275 | $13.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |