The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DFIN · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DFIN | CACI | LAWIL | NCMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 100 (highest) | 63 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 27 | 88 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 72 (highest) | 19 | 4 | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 67 (highest) | 6 | 0 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 99 (highest) | 95 | 20 |
| 29% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 164% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 78% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $13.6B | Not reported | $192M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |