The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DFNS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FUNI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BA · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RMSL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureDFNSFUNIBARMSL
Moat Score (0–100)20 (highest)20 (highest)20 (highest)20 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2069 (highest)20
Pricing power029 (highest)06
Returns on capital0011 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)28028
Capital allocation24242044 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$82.8M$2.8M$212.1B$4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025