The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DHX · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MLGO · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

EFX · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SLE · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureDHXMLGOEFXSLE
Moat Score (0–100)3839 (highest)3838
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2855 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)2555
Returns on capital050 (highest)190
Balance-sheet safety055 (highest)2655 (highest)
Capital allocation64 (highest)245444
341% above value if growth stopped today670% above value if growth stopped today144% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$171M$183M$20.8B$3M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2022FY2025FY2025