The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DJCO · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EOG · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DJCO | CHD | EOG | MH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 | 66 (highest) | 66 (highest) | 65 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 54 | 62 | 72 |
| Pricing power | — | 77 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 69 (highest) | 64 | 22 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 60 | 94 | 50 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 72 | 44 | 80 (highest) |
| 19% above value if growth stopped today | 175% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 17% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.0B | $23.1B | Not reported | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |