The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DLTH | CTRN | DLTI | PBSV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 21 (highest) | 13 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 88 (highest) | — | 60 | 46 |
| Returns on capital | 45 (highest) | 34 | 0 | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 51 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 6 | 40 | 53 (highest) | 45 |
| 782% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 808% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $145M | $525M | $22.8M | $9.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2023 | FY2025 |