The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NRDY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PATK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | DLTR | NRDY | PATK | CVSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 39 | 52 | 23 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 48 | 97 (highest) | 26 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 64 | — | 100 (highest) | 27 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 90 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 63 |
| Capital allocation | 69 | 44 | 60 | 82 (highest) |
| 70% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 17% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 66% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $24.2B | $739M | $2.1B | $4.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |