The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CVAT · Agriculture · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DMC | GRUSF | CVAT | TSNDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 40 (highest) | 39 | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 85 (highest) | 20 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 11 | 72 | 84 (highest) | 77 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 71 (highest) | 0 | 28 | 1 |
| Capital allocation | 35 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| 27% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $95M | $9.5M | $146M |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |