The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OFAL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DOGP | RTB | HZO | OFAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 33 (highest) | 32 | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 20 | 36 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 44 | 39 | 29 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 23 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 64 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | 6% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.1M | $7.9M | $1.1B | $9.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |