The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SDEV · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ALTI · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DOMH | HUT | SDEV | ALTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 42 (highest) | 41 | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 57 | — | 60 |
| Pricing power | 30 | 71 | 84 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 9 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $42.4M | $8.2B | $25.7M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |