The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RPC · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WHG · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ALTI · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DOMH | RPC | WHG | ALTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 46 (highest) | 45 | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 95 (highest) | 50 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 30 | — | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 10 | 11 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 4 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 74 (highest) | 18 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $42.4M | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |