The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AERT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
AKA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | DRVN | AERT | AKA | UAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 37 | 57 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 38 | 92 (highest) | 77 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 0 | 5 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 71 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 84 (highest) | 80 | 43 | 50 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 2164% above high estimate | 1162% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 1716% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $2.4B | $318.1M | $119.6M | $3.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |