The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LSEB · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DRVN | FOXF | LSEB | AN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 82 (highest) | 36 | — | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | 57 | 93 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 71 (highest) | 0 | 53 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 84 (highest) | 24 | 24 | — |
| 1989% above value if growth stopped today | 48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2.2B | $774M | Not reported | $7.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |