The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SNBH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FOXF · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureDRVNSNBHFOXFAN
Moat Score (0–100)43 (highest)43 (highest)43 (highest)42
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend82 (highest)503650
Pricing power70 (highest)5728
Returns on capital571 (highest)53
Balance-sheet safety0282840 (highest)
Capital allocation84 (highest)2424
1964% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data39% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$2.2B$1.4M$905M$7.4B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025