The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DSGT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WATT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DSGT | WATT | CERT | GUER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 60 | 63 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 61 | 33 | 100 (highest) | 97 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 40 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 36 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 561% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $87258 | $33.3M | $1.1B | $29.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |