The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAPS · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DSNY | MAPS | ETSY | LOGI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 39 | 25 | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 | 100 (highest) | 99 | 63 |
| Returns on capital | 78 | — | 91 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 31 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 44 | 64 (highest) | 20 |
| 7% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 88% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.5M | Not reported | $8.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |