The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DTI | RBC | TAYD | NUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 100 (highest) | 86 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 64 | 26 | 98 |
| Returns on capital | 88 (highest) | 13 | 36 | 75 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 80 | 100 (highest) | 62 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 60 | 68 (highest) | 61 |
| 36% below value if growth stopped today | 511% above value if growth stopped today | 144% above value if growth stopped today | 81% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $66.3M | $16.3B | $232M | $247M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |